Der YouTube-Player wird erst nach dem Klick geladen. Alternativ: Original direkt bei YouTube öffnen.
Was du mitnimmst
- Ein niedriger Einstiegspreis, etwa 5000 statt 10000 Dollar im Monat, macht den Verkaufsabschluss leichter.
- Bezahlung nach Erfolg statt einer festen Monatsgebühr kann besser zum tatsächlichen Wert für den Kunden passen.
- Bei riesigem Volumen wie Millionen Emails im Monat kann eine Gebühr von 10000 Dollar viel zu niedrig sein.
- Mit wachsendem Volumen werden Systeme, Daten und ehrliches Reporting der Kunden zum größten Risiko.
Volltranskript
Das Transkript ist das englische Original mit Timecodes. Die deutsche Zusammenfassung steht oben. Sprecher werden automatisch zugeordnet.
0:00Unternehmer/Gast I run a uh uh very high volume cold email agency basically. We work with a lot of uh B2B SaaS companies that have TAMs over at least 10 million users or um B2B service businesses that have LTVs over like 50 grand uh typically, right? We're good at the meeting pathway and also a PLG pathway with SaaS. >> Um I currently do uh 2.2 million. Um I'm pretty sure I can take that to 10 million within the next like year or so.
0:26>> Okay. >> Um primarily because um uh because I think I know what to do next based off of this weekend even before here, a lot of stuff like that. So, if anything, it'll be interesting to just hear you criticize maybe what I think I should do. >> Okay. >> Right? Um so, we got to 2.2 by doing having like $10,000 monthly retainers. >> Okay. >> What we're doing is switching to performance models at scale. >> Okay.
0:51>> Where it's like, "Hey, let me understand your LTV. We'll do a third of uh we'll charge a fee roughly equal to We'll make sure your CAC is a third. >> Okay. >> Maybe that needs to be different, you know, but that's the idea. Um switch it to 5K, so it's really easy to close cuz most people when you tell them five, it's really easy for them to hop into the funnel or just go, "Yep, let's try this out." >> Mhm. >> And then we have performance set up on the back end. >> Uh-huh. >> Um the advantage is that like um What do you think the biggest problem's going to be?
1:18Uh systems that will break. I think private data and analytics to be able to actually know what properly to do for each client at that type of scale. Cuz some of our clients will send like 10 plus emails a month written with AI. One-to-one. >> Uh-huh. 10 plus or like 10,000?
1:42Alex >> Uh 10 million emails per month, yeah. >> Um So, this is so interesting. So, like the fee sounds wildly underpriced. Like if you're sending 10 million emails and you're charging $10,000, that sounds absurdly low. >> Yeah, I would say um we started to get them in and we'll send 100,000 test message market fit the second we find the multiple.
2:07Um that or we go, "Cool. I know if I target SAS founders with this message, there's 800,000 of them. If I hit that list, I'll sign up 601." Uh we can crank it that way, right? So, it's almost to get them in there where we have the >> Is the biggest issue running out of lists? >> [snorts] >> No. >> Okay. >> No, cuz basically it's like, "Let me email your entire team every 2 months." >> So, what else uh what else do you think is going to be the uh the biggest problem with this model?
2:33>> Um keeping clients honest, potentially. >> Uh-huh. >> Um on collecting if it's based off of percentages or whatever it may be. >> Yeah. >> Which is where I also think it's maybe like a systems problem in that I need to have proper integrations to their CRMs to keep them honest. Which maybe I need to acquire uh or like uh get the right developers or something like that. Be able to do that better.
2:59Alex >> Yeah. >> Um >> So, um >> What stands out? >> Yeah. So, the the problem that I would foresee is the one that you just brought up, which is what I was hoping you'd get to. >> Mhm. >> Um whenever you switch to performance, performance is always always the best model on paper. Not always the best model in practice. >> Mhm. >> And it's strongly predicated on the quality of the prospect. >> Yeah.
3:25>> So, if you have enterprise customers who are basically who have obligations and have assets and have [ __ ] to lose, >> Mhm. >> they tend to follow and adhere to their contracts. >> Mhm. >> Smaller, even sometimes medium business owners, less so. And um are you US? >> Yeah. >> Okay. Yeah. And US contracts mean basically nothing. And so, um all of these things are kind of like stacked against you. >> Mhm. >> Um and Alan was a performance-based model, so I like very much understand this business.
3:53>> Yeah. >> Um Now, we were able to do it only because I controlled the flow of payments. I got paid. >> Mhm. And then gave them >> remitted their part. So, >> Yeah. >> you always want to control the the money flow if you do performance. >> Mhm. >> Or you have to have absolute transparency. So, like you run the Shopify store. That's why Shopify agencies can do performance. A lot of email marketing for Shopify, they do they do performance percentages uh you know, using Klaviyo and whatnot. And that that model works great for them cuz the tracking's clear and most people No one's going to start a second store to try and cut you out.
4:30Alex >> Yeah. >> Brick-and-mortar, guy walks in, "Ah, he didn't show." Guy closed for 50 grand. >> Mhm. >> How do you know? I You you set up a Unfortunately, you set up an incentive system that incentivizes them to cheat you. >> Mhm. >> And if they have to cheat them or cheat you, they will cheat you. >> Mhm. >> So, I'm not a huge fan. >> Mhm. >> I would prefer to just factor in um basically scaled based on what you know the ROI is roughly to kind of like a North Star metric, which might be uh you know, for every million emails, it's this.
5:04And you might have to just do that custom up front in terms of like, "Okay, based on your customer, based on your avatar, and your segment, this is the rate." I'm not the biggest fan of custom pricing, but based on the model that you have, it might make sense given you probably have fewer customers that are worth more, >> Mhm. >> I'm assuming. >> Yeah. >> What's your churn? >> Um but probably uh 30% or something like that. >> Annually? >> But also, I've I've changed my offer. Yeah. >> Okay. >> Yeah, annually. I've changed my offer enough to where it's kind of hard to be like, "What's the actual churn on the current offer?" But, yeah.
5:33>> Okay. Um why do you why do people leave? >> Um >> Cuz you charge nothing. >> You um Well, we used to charge 10K's flat to be like, "Here's how many emails we'll send." Right? Most of the time when they would leave, it wouldn't be because of performance, it'd be because their offer wouldn't What we weren't able to find a good offer message uh message market fit for them especially, right? >> have you been able to separate cohort churn as in like first 3 months versus 3 months plus?
6:03Alex >> No. >> Okay. >> No. >> So, I would consider positive uh having a two two-part structure where you charge a one-time fee that's significantly higher up front but is zero recurring. >> Mhm. >> To do the one thing which is we're going to find message market fit. >> Mhm. >> After that, you solve that problem, you say, "Hey, if you want, you can go send 10 million emails a month uh with this messaging." And they'll be like, "Well, we don't know how to do that." You're like, "Oh, that's crazy. You know, we do that if you want." And then you can say, "Let me introduce you to our other tier of pricing."
6:32>> Mhm. >> And that might be a a best-of-both-worlds model. And you will be astonished, by the way, at how much easier it is to sell a one-time thing versus an ongoing thing. >> Mhm. Interesting. I wonder um >> Like you can double or triple close rates from a $1,500 a month membership to a $5,000 one-time up front. You can triple close rates at triple the price. >> Mhm. Yeah, for sure. >> I just say 9x. >> Does it Does it change your thought process at all when like uh the like monthly recurring we've been able to achieve with these performance models and huge TAMs? Like we're billing some clients like 75 or like 100K a month.
7:06>> Okay. >> All of a sudden, right? >> But you said you did 2 million. >> Um Yeah, because the reason I got this idea for the performance is because we got a a whale. I was like, "Holy shit." Where'd you get in a 100 bucks for a sales cycle? >> one customer. >> Um we just closed another, up-sold them into performance, and we start like this month. And >> So, you have one customer who's doing the big the big whale up thing. >> Yeah, correct. I'm not trying to I'm trying to understand. Yeah, yeah, of course.
7:32Alex >> Okay. So, So, there's one there. It looks promising. To go back to what I said earlier, if you have enterprise customers, cool. >> Yeah. >> The fact that you said many cuz I'm using the data you gave me. So if you say I'm doing $2 million a year, we're charging $10,000 a month, I'm going to back back of a napkin and be like, okay, they got 20-ish customers. And if they're paying $10,000 a month and sending 10 million emails, it doesn't make any sense, but okay, let's keep going. Um beyond that, it's like, okay, well, if they've got 20 customers at that price point, they're probably low. They're SMBs. They're not They're not even mid-market. This whale is mid-market. And if you had said, "Hey, we only deal with uh businesses that are doing over 10 million in ARR and are venture-backed or what you know, whatever whatever the the criteria are, that I would say I have high confidence that one, they can pay and two, that they even track, then I would have much higher confidence in saying, "Yeah, go for it on the performance model."
8:20Alex >> Okay, cool. >> But the biggest risk that you're paying down is that they don't pay you. >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, that makes sense. >> Basically, if you have high confidence of the payment, then the performance >> I'm all for performance. I mean, I would do $0 up front. I don't even care. If I know that I can get paid, I'm all in. >> Mhm. >> I just got to know that I can get paid. >> Yeah. >> That's the problem. That is the biggest hinge in this thing. >> That's like the biggest risk of going down that path is you're just stuck. >> Yes. >> Mhm. >> You solve [clears throat] that, you solve the business. >> Yep.
8:45>> That's the That is the whole business. You solve that, you solve the business. >> Yeah, exactly. >> Own that. >> Yeah. >> I built a software company. Like, I get it. >> Yeah, exactly. [laughter] Makes a ton of sense. >> Yeah. Cuz I was going after small guys. So I had to. >> Yep. Thank you. >> If you are a business owner and you are not growing as fast as you like, I'd like to give you a free gift. So my team and I put together the $100 million scaling roadmap, which is basically 200 hours of us looking over all the portfolio companies we've had and what stages of growth they went through and more importantly, where they got stuck and how they got past it. And so we broke it in these 10 stages and we made this little kind of quiz thing where if you put in your business information, it'll tell you where you're at and the most important part for you, what to do for each of functions of the business across product, marketing, sales, customer success, recruiting, IT, human resources, and finance. And so no matter what you're struggling with, someone else has already struggled with it and solved it. And so I'd like to give you this thing absolutely free. You can go to acquisition.com/roadmap, plug in your business information, and if you want us to actually help you de-constrain the business and you're trying to scale, we'd love to help you out. On the thank you page, you can book a call with my team, and we will look at the business, see if we can help, and if we can, we'll invite you out to Vegas, and we'll do this in person, live.