Auf YouTube ansehen
Gewinnen neu definiert: maximaler Einsatz statt Ergebnis
Für dieses Video ist kein abspielbarer Embed freigegeben. Deshalb nur statische Vorschau und Link zum Original.
Was du mitnimmst
- Definiere Gewinnen darüber, ob du wirklich alles gegeben hast, nicht über die Zustimmung anderer.
- Nur du selbst weißt, ob du dein Bestes gegeben hast, das macht dich zum eigenen Richter.
- Als Champion sind deine eigenen Ansprüche höher als die der anderen.
- Manche starten aus Scham heraus, weil Verlieren für sie bedeutet, dass sie nichts taugen.
Volltranskript
Das Transkript ist das englische Original mit Timecodes. Die deutsche Zusammenfassung steht oben. Sprecher werden automatisch zugeordnet.
0:00You can't win by their approval because everyone approves of you because you've already beaten everyone because you've surpassed their dreams. >> Yeah. >> But not yours because you know you can do more. And so, that's when you become judge, jury, and executioner because only you know if you really tried your hardest. >> For sure. >> And it's harder as a champion because your standards are higher. So, you end up winning. But in the case that something happens, you [ __ ] tear your quad the day before, it's like I [ __ ] left it on the field. >> But there's still probably 10 people out there who gave their all and aren't going to win because they're not me, you know?
0:27>> In my mind, they won to themselves. >> Yes. And I also know 50% people get it and then 50% of it just come from the fact of being like driving from shame. Like if I lose, then I suck. >> And I think a lot of people start there. I did. Cuz what happens is when you don't think there's a probability of losing, then what? Either you [ __ ] off and try and get yourself into the possibility of losing to then create the comeback, which is what some champions did. They found alcohol and they come back in cuz they lost the meaning of it. >> Yeah. >> Or they change what winning means to them.